Skip Navigation

U.S. Flag

Print Print   Download Reader Download   Text Enlarge text size Reduce text size Normal text size

Go to Text Version

HHS Recovery Act Recipient Reporting Readiness Tool

Step 4. Review and Copy the Grant Awards Data

TAGGS provides some – but not all – of the data needed for the Recipient Report. Recipients are responsible for directly collecting and reporting all required data to FederalReporting.gov. Data that HHS does not currently collect are highlighted in yellow. Do not copy this highlighted information. Please enter the appropriate data for your organization in these required fields. For assistance with entering these data please contact FederalReporting.gov.

You may capture the data HHS does provide by copying data from this screen and pasting it into the reporting format of your choice, such as the Excel spreadsheet template, the XML template, or by logging into the online form. For assistance with copying and pasting these data please e-mail our help desk at Readiness Help.

 

Award Detail for: NEW OBSERVATIONAL DATA ANALYSIS METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
DUNS Number: 068552207
CAMPUS BOX 1034
SAINT LOUIS, MO 63112
Recipient Report: Grant or Loan
Prime Recipient

Reporting Information
Award Type Award Number Final Report
Grant 1RC4LM010958-01 Recipient responsible for this data

Award Recipient Information
Recipient DUNS Number Recipient Account Number Recipient Congressional District
068552207 Recipient responsible for this data 1

Award Information
Funding Agency Code Awarding Agency Code Award Date
7529 7529 08-24-2010
Amount of Award Sub Account Number for Program Source (TAS)  
$ 1,499,998 Recipient responsible for this data
Program Source (TAS)* CFDA Number 
750845 93.701
Total Number of Sub Awards to Individuals Total Amount of Sub Awards to Individuals
Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
Total Number of Payments to Vendors less than $25,000/award Total Amount of Payments to Vendors less than $25,000/award
Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
Total Number of Sub Awards less than $25,000/award Total Amount of Sub Awards less than $25,000/award
Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
Award Description
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Comparative effectiveness research (CER) is designed to identify healthcare interventions having the best patient outcomes to direct patients to receive the best treatment and to direct our healthcare dollars to where they will be most productive. When comparing observational data to determine the best intervention, CER requires that we apply risk or case-mix adjustment methods before examining outcomes of care. For example, to compare survival in treatment or hospital for inpatient acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients using the proportion surviving may be misleading if the severity of disease is significantly different across interventions or hospital. To make comparisons valid, risk adjustment must balance patient factors, such as disease severity and co-morbidities, which result in different likelihood of death. A standard approach to risk adjustment is to use measures of "observed-to-expected" rates, where expected outcome for patients are estimated by an existing, often unknown and proprietary, regression model previously fit to a standard or reference population of patient data said to be representative of all patients. The observed outcome is obtained from the patient's discharge data. The goal of the risk adjustment is to determine if an intervention (or provider) on average shows better, worse, or the same observed outcomes compared to expected outcomes. We propose to develop and release an open-source HealthCare Rankings (HCR) case-mix adjustment software package combining methods from observational data analysis, operations research, statistics, and mathematics that have not been applied in combination previously in CER and health services research. The HCR algorithm ranks two or more interventions or providers simultaneously based on direct comparison of patient-level data. This algorithm avoids the need to have a reference database for observed-to-expected comparisons. This proposal is a joint effort of investigators in the Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM) Dept. of Medicine's Biostatistical Consulting Center and the BJC HealthCare Center for Clinical Excellence (CCE). There are 11 hospitals in the BJC network with a comprehensive informatics system of patient level clinical and administrative data available for developing and validating the HCR algorithm. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: The goal of this project is to develop and validate novel mathematical methods from operations research and voting theory to perform more accurate comparisons of outcomes and performance among health care interventions and providers. The importance of this project is that if successful there will be new data analysis tools for directing patients to the best treatment and providers for their care based on their level of disease severity and other patient characteristics, and for directing health care dollars to the most cost effective options.

Project Information
Project Name or
Project/Program Title
Project Status Total Federal Amount ARRA Funds
Received/Invoiced
NEW OBSERVATIONAL DATA ANALYSIS METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
Number of Jobs Description of Jobs Created
Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
Quarterly Activities/Project Description
Recipient responsible for this data
 
Activity Code (NAICS or NTEE-NPC)
1Recipient responsible for this data2Recipient responsible for this data
3Recipient responsible for this data4Recipient responsible for this data
5Recipient responsible for this data6Recipient responsible for this data
7Recipient responsible for this data8Recipient responsible for this data
9Recipient responsible for this data10Recipient responsible for this data
Total Federal Amount of ARRA
Expenditure
Total Federal ARRA
Infrastructure Expenditure
Infrastructure Contact Name
Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
Infrastructure Contact Email Infrastructure Contact Phone Infrastructure Contact Phone Ext.
Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
Infrastructure Contact Street Address 1 Infrastructure Contact Street Address 2 Infrastructure Contact Street Address 3
CAMPUS BOX 1034 Not Available Recipient responsible for this data
Infrastructure City Infrastructure State Infrastructure ZIP Code+4
SAINT LOUIS MO 63112
Infrastructure Purpose and Rationale
Recipient responsible for this data

Primary Place of Performance
Street Address 1 Street Address 2 City
660 SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE Recipient responsible for this data ST. LOUIS
State Zip Code+4 Congressional District
MO 631101010 1
Country  
US

Recipient Highly Compensated Officers
Prime Recipient Indication of Reporting Applicability # Officer Name Officer Compensation
Recipient responsible for this data 1 Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
2 Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
3 Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
4 Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data
5 Recipient responsible for this data Recipient responsible for this data

This concludes the current search.
To begin a new search, return to the HHS Recovery Act Recipient Reporting Readiness Tool.

USE IN THE RECIPIENT REPORT

The information provided by this tool is baseline data that the Recipient should include in the Recipient Report that must be submitted to FederalReporting.gov beginning October 1, 2009. The data from this tool can be cut and pasted directly into the Recipient Report.